OSAIM
Open Source AI Models

Comparison

Phi-4 14B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Side-by-side specs, benchmarks and hosted-inference pricing.

Side A
Phi-4 14B
Microsoft · Phi

14B model trained primarily on synthetic data. Punches above its weight on reasoning, especially MATH and GPQA. MIT licensed. A standout choice when you want strong reasoning quality without paying 70B-tier hardware costs. Phi-4 in particular demonstrated that careful synthetic-data curation can extract frontier-class reasoning from a relatively small dense model.

Side B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba · Qwen

Mid-size Qwen2.5 with broad task coverage. The sweet spot for users who want noticeably better quality than 7B but can't justify the hardware footprint of 32B or 72B.

Specs

Parameters14B14B
Context length16K128K
Modalitytexttext
Released2024-12-122024-09-18
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Commercial useYesYes
VRAM fp1628 GB28 GB
VRAM Q48.4 GB8.4 GB

Benchmarks

GPQA56.1
HumanEval82.683.5
MATH80.480.0
MMLU84.879.7
MMLU-Pro70.4

Cheapest hosted pricing

Phi-4 14B
together: $0.30 in / $0.30 out per 1M tokens
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
together: $0.30 in / $0.30 out per 1M tokens
Highlighted cells indicate the better value for that row (higher score, larger context, lower VRAM).