Comparison
Phi-4 14B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Side-by-side specs, benchmarks and hosted-inference pricing.
Side A
Phi-4 14BMicrosoft · Phi
14B model trained primarily on synthetic data. Punches above its weight on reasoning, especially MATH and GPQA. MIT licensed. A standout choice when you want strong reasoning quality without paying 70B-tier hardware costs. Phi-4 in particular demonstrated that careful synthetic-data curation can extract frontier-class reasoning from a relatively small dense model.
Side B
Qwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba · Qwen
Mid-size Qwen2.5 with broad task coverage. The sweet spot for users who want noticeably better quality than 7B but can't justify the hardware footprint of 32B or 72B.
Specs
| Parameters | 14B | 14B |
| Context length | 16K | 128K |
| Modality | text | text |
| Released | 2024-12-12 | 2024-09-18 |
| License | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Yes | Yes |
| VRAM fp16 | 28 GB | 28 GB |
| VRAM Q4 | 8.4 GB | 8.4 GB |
Benchmarks
| GPQA | 56.1 | — |
| HumanEval | 82.6 | 83.5 |
| MATH | 80.4 | 80.0 |
| MMLU | 84.8 | 79.7 |
| MMLU-Pro | 70.4 | — |
Cheapest hosted pricing
Phi-4 14B
together: $0.30 in / $0.30 out per 1M tokens
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
together: $0.30 in / $0.30 out per 1M tokens