OSAIM
Open Source AI Models

Comparison

Phi-4 14B vs Mistral Small 3

Side-by-side specs, benchmarks and hosted-inference pricing.

Side A
Phi-4 14B
Microsoft · Phi

14B model trained primarily on synthetic data. Punches above its weight on reasoning, especially MATH and GPQA. MIT licensed. A standout choice when you want strong reasoning quality without paying 70B-tier hardware costs. Phi-4 in particular demonstrated that careful synthetic-data curation can extract frontier-class reasoning from a relatively small dense model.

Side B
Mistral Small 3
Mistral AI · Mistral

24B dense model from Mistral's January 2025 release that competes with Llama 3.3 70B on many tasks at a third of the parameter count. Apache 2.0 licensed and small enough to run on a single 4090 at Q4. Good pick when you want Llama-3.3-70B-class chat quality but at a friendlier hardware budget, or when the licence matters and Llama's community terms don't fit.

Specs

Parameters14B24B
Context length16K33K
Modalitytexttext
Released2024-12-122025-01-30
LicenseMITApache 2.0
Commercial useYesYes
VRAM fp1628 GB48 GB
VRAM Q48.4 GB14.4 GB

Benchmarks

GPQA56.1
HumanEval82.684.8
MATH80.470.6
MMLU84.881.0
MMLU-Pro70.4

Cheapest hosted pricing

Phi-4 14B
together: $0.30 in / $0.30 out per 1M tokens
Mistral Small 3
together: $0.80 in / $0.80 out per 1M tokens
Highlighted cells indicate the better value for that row (higher score, larger context, lower VRAM).