Comparison
Phi-4 14B vs Mistral Small 3
Side-by-side specs, benchmarks and hosted-inference pricing.
14B model trained primarily on synthetic data. Punches above its weight on reasoning, especially MATH and GPQA. MIT licensed. A standout choice when you want strong reasoning quality without paying 70B-tier hardware costs. Phi-4 in particular demonstrated that careful synthetic-data curation can extract frontier-class reasoning from a relatively small dense model.
24B dense model from Mistral's January 2025 release that competes with Llama 3.3 70B on many tasks at a third of the parameter count. Apache 2.0 licensed and small enough to run on a single 4090 at Q4. Good pick when you want Llama-3.3-70B-class chat quality but at a friendlier hardware budget, or when the licence matters and Llama's community terms don't fit.
Specs
| Parameters | 14B | 24B |
| Context length | 16K | 33K |
| Modality | text | text |
| Released | 2024-12-12 | 2025-01-30 |
| License | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Commercial use | Yes | Yes |
| VRAM fp16 | 28 GB | 48 GB |
| VRAM Q4 | 8.4 GB | 14.4 GB |
Benchmarks
| GPQA | 56.1 | — |
| HumanEval | 82.6 | 84.8 |
| MATH | 80.4 | 70.6 |
| MMLU | 84.8 | 81.0 |
| MMLU-Pro | 70.4 | — |